[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Kernel 2054 breaks nvidia.ko loading

On Thu, 16 Mar 2006, Arjan van de Ven wrote:

On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 08:46 -0800, alan wrote:
On Thu, 16 Mar 2006, Gilboa Davara wrote:

On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 16:50 +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
 It might cut down on the number of "Fedora
ate my baby" posts.

so far most initial FC releases broke nvidia, so I don't expect that
backlash :)

(and future ones most likely again will break it, at some point even
permanent. it's not a question of if but a question of when)

...Hopefully when Linux users will have sufficiently powerful GPU with
mature open-source drivers alternative *.

That is not going to happen until the patent and copy control issues get
straightened out.

Patents are an issue due to liability.  From what I have been told by a
chip designer, everyone steps on everyone elses patents.  If you have an
open source driver, it is easier to prove the violation.  If you have a
closed source driver, it costs a million dollars or more to reverse
engineer it to prove.

I've heard this and many other excuses before ;)
To a large degree it IS an excuse. NVidia just doesn't want to open.
Anything else is basically them trying to find an excuse that sounds
plausible and may get accepted by people.

(It's not that those excuses are lies without any truth; but the causal
relationship just isn't there)

The question I have is who they are afraid of. There are only two manufaturers of fast video cards at this point. (Three, if you count Matrox.) They need to come to a truce and stop all this wasteful bickering.

Especially ATI. They don't even support all of their shipping chipsets with closed source drivers. Their api documentation (what they will release) is inaccurate most of the time.

It may be excuses, but until you can convince the legal department that it is a good idea, it is not going to happen. Yes, it is a cop-out on their part, but they think that playing safe is better than the possible threat from some unknown entity possibly threatening them with legal action.

"George W. Bush -- Bringing back the Sixties one Nixon at a time."

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]