Mono and FC

[Paul W. Frields]

On Sat, 2006-11-04 at 17:45 -0500, Timothy Vismor wrote:
> Maybe you guys are getting a bit carrried away. The Wall Street
> Journal's take on this deal was that it amounted  to a Microsoft
> capitulation on IP rights to Linux. Only Redhat stock was hurt by the
> agreement (following closely on the heels of Oracle's  decision to
> provide support for Redhat Linux). Maybe we should wait to see how
> things play out before making rash decisions. 

+1

My personal opinion is that there is no good technical strategy that
Novell hasn't figured out how to abandon just as they were finally
"getting it."  NetWare and NDS are only the first things that come to
mind.  They've been letting Microsoft take their lunch money for the
last 20+ years; why stop now?

-- 
Paul W. Frields, RHCE                          http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
       Fedora Project Board: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Board
    Fedora Docs Project:  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20061104/4b1eab91/attachment.sig>