Proposals for mono-basic and monodoc

[Rahul Sundaram]

Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 12:52:03PM -0500, Michel Salim wrote:
>> On 11/4/06, Jesse Keating <jkeating at redhat.com> wrote:
>>> On Saturday 04 November 2006 08:13, Paul wrote:
>>>> What is the depth of feeling for moving mono-basic into extras and
>>>> monodoc into core?
>>> Personally, given Novells deal with Microsoft, I'd rather see mono get 
>>> purged
>> >from Fedora all together.  Any future developments in Mono from Novell and
>>> their partners Microsoft have far too much risk of being tainted for my
>>> tastes.
>>>
>> Should we look into getting Tracker into extras, just in case we need
>> to pull Beagle out?
>>
>> http://www.gnome.org/~jamiemcc/tracker/
> 
> If Tracker is a useful app for people then it should be in Extras
> regardless of whether we have Beagle or not. There's plenty of people
> who don't like various aspects of Beagle, but whom still want that kind
> of functionality.

Exactly. Tracker is under review in 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214025. Just tested 
it out. It is extremely fast but the filters atleast in the package 
provided is limited.

Rahul