[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: iptables Problem



On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 11:58:02AM -0400, Janina Sajka wrote:
> > 
> No, we flushed the ruleset in order to make certain we're isolating the
> problem. Furthermore, iptables output suggests it's working, but it
> doesn't actually work udp, though tcp works just as it should.

If this is indeed a complete set of rules then maybe you found
a bug.  I do not know.

> 
> iptables -t nat -I PREROUTING -p udp -d 66.92.XXX.XXX/32 --dport 5060 -j DNAT --to-destination 172.23.203.213
> iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp -d 66.92.XXX.XXX/32 --dport 5060 -j DNAT --to 172.23.203.213

If you will fold two rules above into one by dropping protocol
specifications does this change anything?  According to docs
DNAT option should be "--to-destination" in the second case too.

>  iptables -t nat -I POSTROUTING -s 172.23.203.213/32 -d 0.0.0.0/0  -j SNAT --to-source 66.92.XXX.XXX

Two comments though.  Personally when checking bigger rule sets I
find an output of 'iptables-save', which writes on stdout, easier to
read than 'iptables -L'.  Also there is a LOG target which can help
to track packets as they traverse through your iptables.

   Michal


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]