(OT) Re: 2.6.20 for FC6?

[Gilbert Sebenste]

On Wed, 7 Feb 2007, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:

> So yes, having Xen out of tree is incredibly painful for everyone concerned
> and we are pursuing multiple angles to reduce this pain and hopefully get
> to a state where Xen is in sync with LKML, and preferrably merged. Its a
> large body of code so its not a quick or easy process :-(
>
> Regards,
> Dan.

Thanks for the info...this gives me considerably more insight into how the 
kernel at RH is being developed. I'm almost ashamed to admit that I 
thought the process was streamlined almost to the point of kernel is out, 
recompile with some Redhat stuff thrown in, and voila! 3 days later, 
here's your new kernel for testing. Thanks again for clearing this up!

*******************************************************************************
Gilbert Sebenste                                                     ********
(My opinions only!)                                                  ******
*******************************************************************************