[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: ipw3945 on f7t4

das wrote:
--- dragoran dragoran <drago01 gmail com> wrote:

On 5/1/07, Tom London <selinux gmail com> wrote:

 you need a config file call it whatever you want ex: wpa_supplicant.conf ;)
mine looks like this:


then do (as root)
/sbin/service NetworkManager stop
/usr/sbin/wpa_supplicant -dd -D wext -i wlan0 -c /yoor/configfile.conf
open a second terminal (after it has assiotated) and type (as root)
dhclient wlan0
after this the network should be up and running

*it is indeed!!!*

even for me ;)
thank you for getting all the extra stuff out of the way. hum, what to write bugs for...

np ;)
you can also add -B to wpa_supplicant so that it runs in the background and you don't have to keep the terminal open.
i was looking for iwlist pkg owner - so i could go find a debug pkg and get a backtrace.

$ rpm -qf /sbin/iwlist

this is weird.... I am also running x86_64 but I don't have the i386 one installed.
why are both these archs installed? - humm

 314/1352 pkgs are i386 or i686 (3 of which are i686)
 104/1352 pkgs are noarch
 933/1352 pkgs are x86_64

and the last is gpg-pubkey-1ac70ce6-41bebeef.(none)

metacity-devel-2.18.0-2.fc7.i386 - is the only non-duplicate of the i?86 pkgs, for all the others
there is a corresponding x86_64 pkg.

is this news to anyone that there are so many 'duplicate' i386 pkgs on a x86_64 machine?

how have you installed the system?
fc6 and yum update?
fc6 +anaconda update?
fresh install?
looks like a anaconda/yum bug to me...

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]