F9 Test Request - swfdec

Brian Pepple bpepple at fedoraproject.org
Thu Apr 10 15:35:27 UTC 2008


On Thu, 2008-04-10 at 11:15 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Chuck Anderson (cra at WPI.EDU) said: 
> > > I think that there are probably a lot more flash apps out there that
> > > swfdec *does* work with - just no one has taken the time to report
> > > them.
> > 
> > What's with considering proprietary codecs as failures (red)?  Most 
> > flash out there is going to need proprietary or patent-encumbered 
> > codecs.
> 
> Out of the box it fails; I don't see how that can be considered
> a successful test. Note that all of the ones I marked with red
> fail even *with* the codecs - they terminate early, abort, crash,
> etc. If it was just the codecs, I would have left it as yellow.

This scratch build of swfdec should fix bug #441617, which caused the
majority of the failures that Bill saw.

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=561193

Later,
/B
-- 
Brian Pepple <bpepple at fedoraproject.org>

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BrianPepple
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E
BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B  CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20080410/93acb6e3/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-test-list mailing list