[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: rawhide report: 20080205 changes

Richard Hally wrote:
Andrew Farris wrote:
Richard Hally wrote:
Yes, same problem, dep problem not listed on the broken dep report.

It looks like two dbus builds were canceled and it may have kept them from getting into that repo build, but the next version is built and will satisfy that conflict, it just is not in the repo.


so, the question is why didn't the problem show up in the broken dep part of the report?

I don't know the answer to that, but just making the observation that a canceled build is slightly out of the ordinary and may be a corner case that led to it being missing from the report. The other possibility is that it in fact is not a dependency problem, but rather a conflict, which may not ever be reported in the broken dependencies list... I can't ever recall seeing it.

Andrew Farris <lordmorgul gmail com> www.lordmorgul.net
 gpg 0xC99B1DF3 fingerprint CDEC 6FAD BA27 40DF 707E A2E0 F0F6 E622 C99B 1DF3
No one now has, and no one will ever again get, the big picture. - Daniel Geer
----                                                                       ----

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]