[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Today's F8 kernel update fails!



Andrew Farris wrote:

> Neal Becker wrote:
>> nash received SIGSEGV!  Backtrace (12):
>> /sbin/nash[0x40c7c9]
>> /lib64/libc.so.6[0x3834c30f30]
>> /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0[0x36bf028a89]
>> /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0[0x36bf028e21]
>> /usr/lib64/libbdevid.so.6.0.19(bdevid_module_unload_all+0x24)[0x3e1dc02411]
>> /usr/lib64/libbdevid.so.6.0.19(bdevid_destroy+0x29)[0x3e1dc01bef]
>> /usr/lib64/libnash.so.6.0.19[0x3e1e415fe2]
>> /usr/lib64/libnash.so.6.0.19(nash_vitals_destroy_probes+0x3a)[0x3e1e416661]
>> /usr/lib64/libnash.so.6.0.19(_nashFreeContext+0x16)[0x3e1e406ef4]
>> /sbin/nash[0x40ccd0]
>> /lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf4)[0x3834c1e074]
>> /sbin/nash[0x404179]
>> 
>> 
> 
> Which kernel was this?  (what today are we talking about?)  This occurred
> during the install or booting?
> 
> kernel-2.6.23.14-115? what arch?  That kernel pushed to updates-testing
> 1/24.
> 
kernel-2.6.23.14-107.fc8.x86_64

I see a bunch of similar reports showing up on linux.redhat.fedora.general.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]