A Topic that needs to be discussed on next the QA meeting..

Mike mike.cloaked at gmail.com
Tue Mar 18 08:38:33 UTC 2008


Alan Cox <alan <at> redhat.com> writes:

> I think its pretty minor but I would concur that this is a mistake and we
> should not magically be opening holes any more than your car should come
> with the equivalent "convenience" feature of always being able to open one
> door without the key in case you lose them.

I am quite surprised that this argument has grown the way it has done.

The availability of sshd makes a very convenient management tool if you have
more than one machine and need access between them. It is not exactly difficult
to add a note in the release notes on how to switch it off if it is not 
needed (service sshd stop/chkconfig sshd off) and that is the end of it.

Even for a new user I would hope that each person doing an install would read
the release notes - there are a number of other issues that could bite if
this was not done before the install went ahead - even for experienced users
of prior versions.

I would find it inconvenient not having sshd running - and in the livecd intall
I seem to remember that sshd is off by default? Hence the simpler install for
perhaps more rookie users might be via livecd instead of the other methods?






More information about the fedora-test-list mailing list