Help me triage

Jeroen van Meeuwen kanarip at kanarip.com
Wed Sep 24 09:43:24 UTC 2008


John Poelstra wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I'm trying to meet a (probably overly aggressive) personal goal of 
> having zero NEW rawhide bugs (which are not Package Reviews) by the time 
> of Fedora 10 GA.  Along the way I thought I'd post some of the questions 
> and issues I see while triaging these bugs so we can all learn.  I 
> encourage others to do the same.  I've just knocked the list down to 
> close to 500!
> 
> If you want to join in and help the query for NEW rawhide bugs excluding 
> package reviews is here: http://tinyurl.com/6llac8
> 

I just closed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446389 ;-) One 
more off the list ;-)

> # Should this be considered a blocker?  Do we have any requirements 
> about being able to build all packages from source before GA?
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462971
> 

I think we do... but I can't recall where.

> # does anyone have a labeled USB disk handy that could try this?
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463106
> 

I could, give me a day or two. Comment in bug.

> # How should we be triaging "branch" and other CVS type requests ?
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463105
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463397
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463175
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463139
> 

I don't think we should, but who am I ;-)

> # This CVS request has comment saying "it is done".  Can bug be closed 
> or where can I check to help verify and then close bug?
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463124
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463105
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463175
> 

Normally a Review/CVS request stays open until the package is built and 
submitted to updates or lands in rawhide. If the package is only landing 
in rawhide though there is no automagic bug closing (like bodhi can do 
when you submit the build to updates/ or updates-testing/).

> # is this critical enough to be a blocker?
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463054
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463048
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463047
> 

Here's another one I don't think is important enough to be a blocker:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462601

> # This bug is assigned to a defunct email address... how will this bug 
> be addressed?
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462671
> 

It says in comment #2 that it is fixed as well. Should this not be 
closed NEXTRELEASE (or CURRENTRELEASE?).

Kind regards,

Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip




More information about the fedora-test-list mailing list