[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: what are those SHA1 values in the CHECKSUM files for the beta DVDs?



On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 15:19 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 18:01 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >   they don't look like normal 160-bit SHA1 values.
> 
> The file headers are misleading.  The gpg signature used is a sha1 size,
> but the checksum of the files themselves are actually sha256.  Next time
> we gpg sign checksum files we'll be sure to use a sha256 gpg signature.

The hash sizes are correct for SHA256, but the values I compute for the
source ISO images using sha256sum under RHEL5 are all different from
those in Fedora-11-Beta-source-CHECKSUM. How did that happen??

--Doc Savage
  Fairview Heights, IL


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]