[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Tracker bug for PulseAudio volume control bugs created



On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 08:51 +0200, Gianluca Sforna wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 7:53 AM, Adam Williamson <awilliam redhat com> wrote:
> > Hi, guys. Just a note that I've created
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497966 - alias AlsaVolume -
> > as a tracker bug for reports of cases where the PulseAudio volume
> > control can't usefully control the volume because another mixer channel
> > needs to be adjusted (e.g. no matter what you set the
> > gnome-volume-control slider to, you have to open alsamixer and set PCM
> > to 100% before you hear any sound).
> 
> Is this the kind of bugs that are fixed by creating an entry in the
> ALSA db? if so, it would be nice to add there a reference to the
> procedure required to create the required data on the affected
> machine.

In some cases that's the fix, in others it needs to be fixed in
PulseAudio (it depends if we only need to change the *initial default
level* for a second mixer element - in which case we add an entry to the
ALSA db - or if a second mixer element *needs to be varied dynamically*
when you adjust the single volume slider - in which case Pulse has to be
adjusted to handle this).

I'll add a comment to the bug with a note on what information people
need to report for bugs of this type, thanks for the suggestion.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]