rhythmbox issues
Rob Healey
robhealey1 at gmail.com
Thu Apr 30 07:16:42 UTC 2009
ed, Apr 29, 2009 at 9:10 PM, <fedora-test-list-request at redhat.com> wrote:
> Send fedora-test-list mailing list submissions to
> fedora-test-list at redhat.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> fedora-test-list-request at redhat.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> fedora-test-list-owner at redhat.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of fedora-test-list digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: X still freezing once in a while (MartinG)
> 2. Re: Upgrade from Beta to Preview (Brian Callahan)
> 3. Re: f11 preview experiences (Tom Horsley)
> 4. Re: SSH, firefox, and X (max)
> 5. F11 Preview - First impressions (E.B. A.)
> 6. Re: F11 Preview - First impressions (Mike Chambers)
> 7. Re: f11 preview experiences (TK009)
> 8. Re: F11 Preview - First impressions (Antonio Olivares)
> 9. Re: Can't stop log (Bill Davidsen)
> 10. Re: F11 Preview - First impressions (E.B. A.)
> 11. Re: F11 Preview - First impressions (Antonio Olivares)
> 12. rhythmbox (Rob Healey)
> 13. Re: F11 Preview - First impressions (Patrick O'Callaghan)
> 14. Re: rhythmbox (Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 23:17:42 +0200
> From: MartinG <gronslet at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: X still freezing once in a while
> To: For testers of Fedora Core development releases
> <fedora-test-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID:
> <bcb3ef430904291417s4c3c8d7fp9c2c71e09cf9eb35 at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 9:14 PM, iarly selbir | ski0s <iarlyy at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > I have same problem here.
>
> Me too, on a Lenovo ThinkPad T400 (as thread starter),
> Intel Corporation Mobile 4 Series Chipset Integrated Graphics
> Controller (rev 07) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
> Smolt:
> http://www.smolts.org/client/show/pub_8c3b9b48-bcf7-4f9d-9aab-183e80ba73e4
>
> I also run an updated Rawhide, initially using UXA (the default when
> there is no xorg.conf), but due to corrupted display when I started
> emacs in graphics mode, I put up an minimalistic xorg.conf and chose
> EXA.
> I'm not 100% sure if I did have or didn't have the freezes when using
> UXA, but I do get freezes when I use EXA.
>
> At one point I thought it was due to java (jre-1.6.0_13-fcs.x86_64),
> so I shut down all java stuff (killall java, turn off java globally in
> konqueror, etc). Things didn't stabilize, so now I have gcaldaemon
> running (java app), and use EXA, but no desktop effects, just plain
> kwin.
> What I've experienced is:
> - X just freeze, I can move the mouse, but keyboard is dead.
> - X just crash, I'm kicked out to the login screen
> - When I resume, it seems I am given a vt that doesn't actually work,
> but has an static image of the graphical screen, ie. I cannot move the
> mouse, and no keyboard input is recorded. However, if I press
> ctrl-alt-f1, I'm back in X, and things works.
> - The lockup behavior might be dependent on whether I have been
> through a suspend/resume cycle.
> - Using EXA, I have seen corrupted glyphs on the screen (eg. "f" and
> "t" are a bit shortened, and have an extra dash in them). I've also
> seen random colored lines at random places on the screen.
>
> I have:
> kernel-2.6.29.1-102.fc11.x86_64
> xorg-x11-drv-intel-2.7.0-2.fc11.x86_64
> xorg-x11-server-Xorg-1.6.1-6.fc11.x86_64
>
> > I'm following this bug
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476743
>
> I've seen this too, but *only* when using desktop effects or compiz.
>
> Here's a report on KMS+UXA:
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21181
>
> It might very well be two or more different bugs (EXA vs UXA etc), but
> equally annoying all of them...
>
>
> -MartinG
> (messerting on irc at freenode)
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:41:16 -0400
> From: Brian Callahan <cmdrunix at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: Upgrade from Beta to Preview
> To: fedora-test-list at redhat.com
> Message-ID: <5350D955-AE19-4D58-9DC9-094D77A36446 at gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
>
> > Is there a way to change from Beta to Preview with yum ? I checked
> the
> > preview and the fedora-release rpm is the same as the Beta release.
>
> >>If you are willing to go past the preview use yum update.
>
> What do you mean. I was running Fed 10 and did a yum upgrade . I have
> been yum updating since yesterday morning. My system still shows
> rawhide. I was just thinking that the preview release would change the
> repos from Rawhide to Fed 11 or even 10.92 but I am thinking now that
> it doesn't get changed until the Final release. I just do want to be
> on rawhide once I am on Fed 11. I will run the rawhide on a different
> boot disk or in a VM.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 18:08:43 -0400
> From: Tom Horsley <tom.horsley at att.net>
> Subject: Re: f11 preview experiences
> To: fedora-test-list at redhat.com
> Message-ID: <20090429180843.2882adc4 at zooty>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
>
> On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 07:29:59 -0400
> Tom Horsley wrote:
>
> > That's all I can remember without my notes from last night,
> > may have more to add this evening.
>
> Forgot one: The progress bar for creating ext3 partition is
> still completely frenetic :-).
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 18:15:52 -0400
> From: max <maximilianbianco at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: SSH, firefox, and X
> To: fedora-test-list at redhat.com
> Message-ID: <20090429221552.GA24304 at vertex.ga.at.cox.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> Well I got my happy ass up and went over to the other box on which firefox
> fails over ssh. It doesn't work at all. Funny because I used it a few days
> past and it worked then...well it didn't instantly crash, anyway exceuse the
> noise. Though the logout hanging still seems like a problem.
> --
> "Any fool can know. The point is to understand" --Albert Einstein
>
> Bored??
> http://fiction.wikia.com/wiki/Fuqwit1.0
>
> http://fiction.wikia.com/wiki/Coding_the_Magic_into_the_Eight_Ball
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:20:18 -0500
> From: "E.B. A." <usul80 at gmail.com>
> Subject: F11 Preview - First impressions
> To: fedora-test-list at redhat.com
> Message-ID:
> <a1d3651e0904291520i2e2efa7elea55f87edb494270 at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Hi all,
> I installed and used F11 Preview and these are my first impressions.
>
> - The system runs ok, I did not have any big problem. I have to admit it
> looks more stable than I thought.
>
> - Boot time is a bit higher than the advertised 20 seconds. It goes from 30
> to 50 seconds. I rebooted the system about 5 times. It is still acceptable.
> One question: when the system boots and the progress bar is displayed there
> is no Fedora logo. Is this correct?
>
> - The only problems I had so far are related to the Package Manager.
> Sometimes when I modify the checkboxes in the repository list it freezes or
> it shows an eternal "Waiting in queue" message. This happens sometimes even
> if it is the first thing I do and even if all the update requests are done.
> I have to say, it is slightly less usable than my experience on F9 (I
> missed
> F10, sorry!). Once, after 10 minutes a "yum locked" window popped up.
>
> - I tried to install KDE (both in terminal and using the package manger)
> but
> I continuously get an signature error, which surprised me. See the
> following:
> Package kdelibs-common-4.2.2-12.fc11.x86_64.rpm is not signed
> [root at squarz ~]# ^C
> [root at squarz ~]# ^C
> [root at squarz ~]# yum install @kde-desktop
> Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit
> Setting up Install Process
> [...]
> Total size: 306 M
> Is this ok [y/N]: y
> Downloading Packages:
>
> Package kdelibs-common-4.2.2-12.fc11.x86_64.rpm is not signed
>
>
>
> Thanks,
> Enrico Accenti
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20090429/8be47fa7/attachment.html
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:45:12 -0500
> From: Mike Chambers <mike at miketc.net>
> Subject: Re: F11 Preview - First impressions
> To: For testers of Fedora Core development releases
> <fedora-test-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <1241045112.11122.1.camel at scrappy.miketc.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 17:20 -0500, E.B. A. wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > I installed and used F11 Preview and these are my first impressions.
> >
> > - The system runs ok, I did not have any big problem. I have to admit
> > it looks more stable than I thought.
> >
> > - Boot time is a bit higher than the advertised 20 seconds. It goes
> > from 30 to 50 seconds. I rebooted the system about 5 times. It is
> > still acceptable. One question: when the system boots and the progress
> > bar is displayed there is no Fedora logo. Is this correct?
>
> Try running system-config-services and shutdown a few of the services
> that you may not need and see what you get.
>
> Menu/System/Administration/Services if your running the GUI
>
> --
> Mike Chambers
> Madisonville, KY
>
> Fedora Project - Bugzapper, Tester, User, etc..
> miketc302 at fedoraproject.org
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 18:54:55 -0400
> From: TK009 <john.brown009 at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: f11 preview experiences
> To: For testers of Fedora Core development releases
> <fedora-test-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <49F8DABF.9060900 at gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
>
> Tom Horsley wrote:
> > On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 07:29:59 -0400
> > Tom Horsley wrote:
> >
> >
> >> That's all I can remember without my notes from last night,
> >> may have more to add this evening.
> >>
> >
> > Forgot one: The progress bar for creating ext3 partition is
> > still completely frenetic :-).
> >
> >
> That is a feature to reduce the boredom during the install :p, a nice
> "pick me up" to an otherwise routine task.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:11:22 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Antonio Olivares <olivares14031 at yahoo.com>
> Subject: Re: F11 Preview - First impressions
> To: For testers of Fedora Core development releases
> <fedora-test-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <111838.25632.qm at web52605.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
>
>
>
>
> --- On Wed, 4/29/09, E.B. A. <usul80 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > From: E.B. A. <usul80 at gmail.com>
> > Subject: F11 Preview - First impressions
> > To: fedora-test-list at redhat.com
> > Date: Wednesday, April 29, 2009, 3:20 PM
> > Hi all,
> > I installed and used F11 Preview and these are my first
> > impressions.
> >
> > - The system runs ok, I did not have any big problem. I
> > have to admit it
> > looks more stable than I thought.
> >
> > - Boot time is a bit higher than the advertised 20 seconds.
> > It goes from 30
> > to 50 seconds. I rebooted the system about 5 times. It is
> > still acceptable.
> > One question: when the system boots and the progress bar is
> > displayed there
> > is no Fedora logo. Is this correct?
> IT depends on the graphic card that you have. ie, some of the cards like
> ATI display the Fedora infinity logo correctly, others maybe Nvidia just
> show the progress bar, this depends on your graphics card. Which graphics
> card do you have?
> >
> > - The only problems I had so far are related to the Package
> > Manager.
> > Sometimes when I modify the checkboxes in the repository
> > list it freezes or
> > it shows an eternal "Waiting in queue" message.
> > This happens sometimes even
> > if it is the first thing I do and even if all the update
> > requests are done.
> > I have to say, it is slightly less usable than my
> > experience on F9 (I missed
> > F10, sorry!). Once, after 10 minutes a "yum
> > locked" window popped up.
> This is normal, if you are using CLI/command line yum, the PackageKit kicks
> in and tries to connect itself, but since yum is running already from
> command line, it complains that it cannot get the "exclusive Lock".
> >
> > - I tried to install KDE (both in terminal and using the
> > package manger) but
> > I continuously get an signature error, which surprised me.
> > See the
> > following:
> > Package kdelibs-common-4.2.2-12.fc11.x86_64.rpm is not
> > signed
> > [root at squarz ~]# ^C
> > [root at squarz ~]# ^C
> > [root at squarz ~]# yum install @kde-desktop
> > Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit
> > Setting up Install Process
> > [...]
> > Total size: 306 M
> > Is this ok [y/N]: y
> > Downloading Packages:
> >
> > Package kdelibs-common-4.2.2-12.fc11.x86_64.rpm is not
> > signed
> This should not happen, rawhide packages are not signed. Maybe a bug.
> Also the way that you are trying to install KDE is different than I have
> seen. As long as it works it is OK. I have seen it recommendend to do a
> # yum install "K Desktop Environment"
>
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Enrico Accenti
> > --
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Antonio
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 9
> Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:19:54 -0400
> From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen at tmr.com>
> Subject: Re: Can't stop log
> To: For testers of Fedora Core development releases
> <fedora-test-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <49F8EEAA.9040504 at tmr.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> max wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 01:01:57PM -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> >> After I booted my FC11 test system and did an update, I tried to
> >> shutdown and got this failure.
> >> I clicked system->shutdown->shutdown_button and the system hung. An
> >> investigation of the log shows that attached behavior.
> >>
> >> If I log out and click the shutdown button it works, so it seems to only
> >> happen when using the button while logged in.
> >>
> >> Running 'shutdown -h' as root also works.
> >>
> >> I assume that this is an SElinux behavior, before I BZ it, is it
> intentional?
> >>
> > Is there nothing in audit.log related to this?
> >
> The only thing which might be useful is attached. Time fits, and nothing
> within
> minutes of that.
>
> --
> Bill Davidsen <davidsen at tmr.com>
> "We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
> the machinations of the wicked." - from Slashdot
> -------------- next part --------------
> type=AVC msg=audit(1241012798.972:26): avc: denied { create } for
> pid=5301 comm="shutdown"
> scontext=system_u:system_r:consolekit_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023
> tcontext=system_u:system_r:consolekit_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023
> tclass=netlink_audit_socket
> type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1241012798.972:26): arch=40000003 syscall=102
> success=no exit=-13 a0=1 a1=bf8159c0 a2=2faff4 a3=3 items=0 ppid=5299
> pid=5301 auid=4294967295 uid=0 gid=0 euid=0 suid=0 fsuid=0 egid=0 sgid=0
> fsgid=0 tty=(none) ses=4294967295 comm="shutdown" exe="/sbin/shutdown"
> subj=system_u:system_r:consolekit_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 key=(null)
> type=CRED_DISP msg=audit(1241012799.095:27): user pid=2069 uid=0 auid=501
> ses=1 subj=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023
> msg='op=PAM:setcred acct="root" exe="/bin/su" (hostname=?, addr=?,
> terminal=pts/3 res=success)'
> type=USER_END msg=audit(1241012799.097:28): user pid=2069 uid=0 auid=501
> ses=1 subj=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023
> msg='op=PAM:session_close acct="root" exe="/bin/su" (hostname=?, addr=?,
> terminal=pts/3 res=success)'
> type=SYSTEM_RUNLEVEL msg=audit(1241012799.232:29): user pid=5331 uid=0
> auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 subj=system_u:system_r:initrc_t:s0
> msg='old-level=5 new-level=0: exe="/sbin/runlevel" (hostname=?, addr=?,
> terminal=console res=success)'
> type=AVC msg=audit(1241012799.315:30): avc: denied { create } for
> pid=5336 comm="shutdown"
> scontext=system_u:system_r:consolekit_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023
> tcontext=system_u:system_r:consolekit_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023
> tclass=netlink_audit_socket
> type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1241012799.315:30): arch=40000003 syscall=102
> success=no exit=-13 a0=1 a1=bf9fb880 a2=2faff4 a3=3 items=0 ppid=5313
> pid=5336 auid=4294967295 uid=0 gid=0 euid=0 suid=0 fsuid=0 egid=0 sgid=0
> fsgid=0 tty=(none) ses=4294967295 comm="shutdown" exe="/sbin/shutdown"
> subj=system_u:system_r:consolekit_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 key=(null)
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 10
> Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 19:51:07 -0500
> From: "E.B. A." <usul80 at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: F11 Preview - First impressions
> To: fedora-test-list at redhat.com
> Message-ID:
> <a1d3651e0904291751vdf69835wd99d866895e9f3b1 at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Thanks Antonio. My video card is indeed a nVidia, that my explain why I
> don't see the logo.
>
> I still have the problem with KDE and ** any other package I try to
> install**, including non repo apps such as Skype or Flash Player. This
> happens both using the GUI and CLI.
> See the following two attempts (I removed useless parts):
>
> [root at squarz yum.repos.d]# yum install "K Desktop Environment"
> Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit
> Setting up Install Process
> No Match for argument: K Desktop Environment
> No package K Desktop Environment available.
> Nothing to do
> [root at squarz yum.repos.d]#
>
> -------
>
> [root at squarz yum.repos.d]# yum groupinstall "KDE (K Desktop Environment)"
> Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit
> Setting up Group Process
>
> [...]
>
> Transaction Summary
>
> ================================================================================
> Install 118 Package(s)
> Update 6 Package(s)
> Remove 0 Package(s)
>
> Total size: 306 M
> Is this ok [y/N]: y
> Downloading Packages:
>
>
> Package kdelibs-common-4.2.2-12.fc11.x86_64.rpm is not signed
> [root at squarz yum.repos.d]#
>
>
>
> Most probably I do something wrong, but I'd really like to know what!
>
> Thanks for your time,
>
> Enrico Accenti
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20090429/b6dd8745/attachment.html
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 11
> Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 18:53:10 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Antonio Olivares <olivares14031 at yahoo.com>
> Subject: Re: F11 Preview - First impressions
> To: For testers of Fedora Core development releases
> <fedora-test-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <833887.74592.qm at web52603.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
>
>
>
>
> --- On Wed, 4/29/09, E.B. A. <usul80 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > From: E.B. A. <usul80 at gmail.com>
> > Subject: Re: F11 Preview - First impressions
> > To: fedora-test-list at redhat.com
> > Date: Wednesday, April 29, 2009, 5:51 PM
> > Thanks Antonio. My video card is indeed a nVidia, that my
> > explain why I
> > don't see the logo.
> >
> > I still have the problem with KDE and ** any other package
> > I try to
> > install**, including non repo apps such as Skype or Flash
> > Player. This
> > happens both using the GUI and CLI.
> > See the following two attempts (I removed useless parts):
> >
> > [root at squarz yum.repos.d]# yum install "K Desktop
> > Environment"
> > Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit
> > Setting up Install Process
> > No Match for argument: K Desktop Environment
> > No package K Desktop Environment available.
> > Nothing to do
> > [root at squarz yum.repos.d]#
> >
> > -------
> >
> > [root at squarz yum.repos.d]# yum groupinstall "KDE (K
> > Desktop Environment)"
> > Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit
> > Setting up Group Process
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > Transaction Summary
> >
> ================================================================================
> > Install 118 Package(s)
> > Update 6 Package(s)
> > Remove 0 Package(s)
> >
> > Total size: 306 M
> > Is this ok [y/N]: y
> > Downloading Packages:
> >
> >
> > Package kdelibs-common-4.2.2-12.fc11.x86_64.rpm is not
> > signed
> > [root at squarz yum.repos.d]#
> >
> >
> >
> > Most probably I do something wrong, but I'd really like
> > to know what!
> >
> > Thanks for your time,
> >
> > Enrico Accenti
> > --
> > fedora-test-list mailing list
> > fedora-test-list at redhat.com
> > To unsubscribe:
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
>
> Enrico,
>
> Can't remember from the top of my head a trick to skip gpg-signatures. In
> Fedora rawhide the gpgcheck should be set to 0. You can become su - or use
> $ su -c 'vi /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora-rawhide.repo
>
> and remove the 1 and make it a zero
>
> [root at localhost yum.repos.d]# cat fedora-rawhide.repo
> # These packages are untested and still under development. This
> # repository is used for development of new releases.
> #
> # This repository can see significant daily turnover and major
> # functionality changes which cause unexpected problems with other
> # development packages. Please use these packages if you want to work
> # with the Fedora developers by testing these new development packages.
> #
> # fedora-test-list at redhat.com is available as a discussion forum for
> # testing and troubleshooting for development packages in conjunction
> # with new test releases.
> #
> # More information is available at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Testing
> #
> # Reproducible and reportable issues should be filed at
> # http://bugzilla.redhat.com/.
> #
> # Product: Fedora
> # Version: rawhide
>
> [rawhide]
> name=Fedora - Rawhide - Developmental packages for the next Fedora release
> failovermethod=priority
> #baseurl=
> http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/$basearch/os/
>
> mirrorlist=http://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/mirrorlist?repo=rawhide&arch=$basearch
> enabled=0
> gpgcheck=0
> gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-test-$basearch<http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/$basearch/os/%0Amirrorlist=http://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/mirrorlist?repo=rawhide&arch=$basearch%0Aenabled=0%0Agpgcheck=0%0Agpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-test-$basearch>file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-$basearch
>
> [rawhide-debuginfo]
> name=Fedora - Rawhide - Debug
> failovermethod=priority
> #baseurl=
> http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/$basearch/debug/
>
> mirrorlist=http://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/mirrorlist?repo=rawhide-debug&arch=$basearch
> enabled=0
> gpgcheck=0
> gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-test-$basearch<http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/$basearch/debug/%0Amirrorlist=http://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/mirrorlist?repo=rawhide-debug&arch=$basearch%0Aenabled=0%0Agpgcheck=0%0Agpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-test-$basearch>file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-$basearch
>
> .....
>
> That should get KDE installed. Make it a zero and save the file, try to
> install KDE again. Hope this helps.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Antonio
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 12
> Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 19:07:09 -0700
> From: Rob Healey <robhealey1 at gmail.com>
> Subject: rhythmbox
> To: Fedora rawhide test list <fedora-test-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID:
> <a1b313a10904291907q63c10d12v9b0807d5e4e093ad at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Greetings:
>
> I have F11 fully updated and all of gstreamer, totem, xine, xmms files are
> installed...
>
> When I try to import an ogg file, it goes into the import errors instead.
> Is there a known problem with this or is it just me?
>
> Sincerely,
> Rob G. Healey
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20090429/13679bb0/attachment.html
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 13
> Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 22:36:19 -0430
> From: "Patrick O'Callaghan" <pocallaghan at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: F11 Preview - First impressions
> To: fedora-test-list at redhat.com
> Message-ID: <1241060779.7347.10.camel at bree.homelinux.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 18:53 -0700, Antonio Olivares wrote:
> > Can't remember from the top of my head a trick to skip gpg-signatures.
>
> RTFM
>
> yum --nogpg ...
>
> poc
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 14
> Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 00:10:05 -0400
> From: Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: rhythmbox
> To: For testers of Fedora Core development releases
> <fedora-test-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <1241064605.9219.346.camel at ignacio.lan>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 19:07 -0700, Rob Healey wrote:
> > When I try to import an ogg file, it goes into the import errors
> > instead. Is there a known problem with this or is it just me?
>
> What does file say about it?
I am sorry, but I am not sure what you mean??? If you mean file properties,
then here it is:
Ogg Audio (audio/ogg)
4.0 Mb
>
>
> --
> Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet at gmail.com>
>
> PLEASE don't CC me; I'm already subscribed
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: not available
> Type: application/pgp-signature
> Size: 197 bytes
> Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
> Url :
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20090430/c6d2980b/attachment.bin
>
> ------------------------------
>
> --
> fedora-test-list mailing list
> fedora-test-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
>
> End of fedora-test-list Digest, Vol 62, Issue 149
> *************************************************
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20090430/99a2427e/attachment.htm>
More information about the fedora-test-list
mailing list