Bugzilla semantics: marking bugs as triaged

Adam Williamson awilliam at redhat.com
Fri Jul 17 02:06:58 UTC 2009


On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 18:56 -0700, John Poelstra wrote:

> > We'd be interested in thoughts - negative, positive, whatever - on the
> > idea. Thanks!

> This has been discussed at length before.  I believe the initial 
> reluctance was changing the set process for a handful of people that 
> wanted to do things differently and then trying to keep track of that. 
> One major reason for not changing the state definitions was that the 
> Fedora usage of the bug states was the same as RHEL.
> 
> At one time I thought the "keyword" approach was a good idea and it 
> still seems to make a lot of good sense... I can't remember why we 
> didn't move forward with it, but as you explain, it seems like a good 
> compromise.

I think it feels like a bigger change than it is. In fact, I think the
case may well be the same for RHEL; RHEL seems to use ASSIGNED in the
same way Fedora does (i.e. it's abused to mean 'Triaged').

That makes it a bit double-edged - it's not a big change to make, but
it's also not a big deal not to change...

-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net




More information about the fedora-test-list mailing list