Bugzilla semantics: marking bugs as triaged
Adam Williamson
awilliam at redhat.com
Fri Jul 17 02:06:58 UTC 2009
On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 18:56 -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
> > We'd be interested in thoughts - negative, positive, whatever - on the
> > idea. Thanks!
> This has been discussed at length before. I believe the initial
> reluctance was changing the set process for a handful of people that
> wanted to do things differently and then trying to keep track of that.
> One major reason for not changing the state definitions was that the
> Fedora usage of the bug states was the same as RHEL.
>
> At one time I thought the "keyword" approach was a good idea and it
> still seems to make a lot of good sense... I can't remember why we
> didn't move forward with it, but as you explain, it seems like a good
> compromise.
I think it feels like a bigger change than it is. In fact, I think the
case may well be the same for RHEL; RHEL seems to use ASSIGNED in the
same way Fedora does (i.e. it's abused to mean 'Triaged').
That makes it a bit double-edged - it's not a big change to make, but
it's also not a big deal not to change...
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net
More information about the fedora-test-list
mailing list