Interesting comments

[John Summerfield]

Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-03-12 at 08:52 +0900, John Summerfield wrote:


>> Ah. There's a program that is supposed to respond to button-presses on a 
>> scanner. buttond or some such.
> 
>> Its presence doesn't much affect the release, but in the context of 
>> _that application_ I'd classify it as critical, a release blocker and 
>> simply omit it unless someone (the packager?) actually tested it and 
>> made it work.
> 
> Well, I'd classify it as priority low, severity critical. I don't see
> why it should block a release. Sure, it's crappy code, but it's not

It wouldn't block the release of anything more than itself;-)


> likely to cause anyone any particularly massive inconvenience. I'd
> rather have the non-infinite amount of resources we have to spend on
> prioritizing release-critical issues spent on things that will
> significantly inconvenience large amounts of people. But now we're
> getting into specifics rather than procedure, which is a different
> debate.


-- 

Cheers
John

-- spambait
1aaaaaaa at coco.merseine.nu  Z1aaaaaaa at coco.merseine.nu
-- Advice
http://webfoot.com/advice/email.top.php
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555375

You cannot reply off-list:-)