[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: some odd package group selections in f12 beta

On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 10:13:00AM -0500, James Laska wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-10-31 at 11:35 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > finally getting around to f12 beta, and some of the groupings of
> > software seem a bit odd.
> > 
> > * wouldn't "publican" make sense under "Authoring and Publishing"?
> > and perhaps "xmlto"?  others?
> Re: publican - Probably best to discuss with the Fedora Docs Team
> (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Docs_Project) or the publican
> maintainer.
> xmlto is listed as a default package under "Authoring and Publishing"

"Authoring and Publishing" is definitely the right place, along with
other DocBook tools already found there.  Probably you also want the
'publican-fedora' brand package as well.

> > * how did minicom end in "Electronic Lab"?
> I see minicom in both "Electronic Lab" and "Dial-up networking".
> Perhaps a good question for Chitlesh (see
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ElectronicLab_Spin) on why it's listed
> under electronic lab.

Serial line testing?

Paul W. Frields                                http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
  http://redhat.com/   -  -  -  -   http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
  irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]