[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Standardize/ have consistency in the layout of How_to_Debug_<component> wiki pages.



On Fri, 2009-10-09 at 11:28 -0400, campbecg cox net wrote:
> ---- "\"Jóhann B. Guðmundsson\"" <johannbg hi is> wrote: 
> > On 10/09/2009 01:58 AM, Christopher Beland wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 10:29 +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> > >   
> > >> Does not actually matter what we call these pages as long as they have
> > >> consistent naming and consistent layout.  
> > >>     
> > > I'm pretty ambivalent as well, but if are agreed that consistency in
> > > naming is desired, we need to pick one system.  My preferences are, in
> > > order from best to worst: "ComponentX Problems", "How to Debug
> > > ComponentX" and "Bug Info ComponentX".  Perhaps someone can take a poll
> > > at the next meeting.
> > >
> > >   
> > 
> > My preference are in the order from best to worst.. How to Debug ,
> > ComponentX Problems, Bug Info ComponentX
> 
> As a reporter, looking at the wiki, I would see a page called "Bug
> Info ComponentX" and expect a page relating to known bugs on
> componentx, a page called "ComponentX Problems" to be full of known
> issues related to using componentx, and "How to Debug ComponentX" at a
> howto about how to actually debug it.

Thanks for the input.

For the record, I came up with the bug_info_X names, and I entirely
agree that both how_to_debug_x and x_problems are better, my name
sucks. :)

-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]