Beta on Beta: VMware Workstation 7 RC on F12B?

[David]

On 10/25/2009 9:38 PM, James Cassell wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Oct 2009 21:34:29 -0400, David <dgboles at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>>
>> You do understand just why you got the "negative feedback" about Nvidia
>> correct? Since the code is no OSS they can not fix it or help you.
> 
> Of course I understand.  It just seemed to me that it was being
> suggested that I put a bug in the fedora bugzilla about the SELinux
> error having to do with VMware, which is why I brought it up.


Fair enough. A misunderstanding.

My guess(es) here would be:

Fedora Bugzilla will not solve anything. The bug will probably just be
closed since it can not be fixed by Fedora.

The SELinux list *might* at least get you enough instructions to write
an 'exception' rule. There is a different name for this but I can recall
it at the moment.

Vmware has their own Bugzilla. I just looked for it. I would think that
there would be the place to report this. I would think that this is a
bug that they would fix. Or at least offer a 'do this' fix for the user
to apply.

Good luck.
-- 


  David

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 834 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20091025/eeecae96/attachment.sig>