Can a triager consider to set CLOSED NEXTRELEASE?

[Matthias Clasen]

On Wed, 2009-09-23 at 17:17 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-09-24 at 00:24 +0300, Sergey Rudchenko wrote:
> > Hi there,
> > 
> > According to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/BugStatusWorkFlow
> > CLOSED NEXTRELEASE/RAWHIDE resolution is for maintainers only.
> > 
> > But for bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498361 is
> > already clear now.
> > 
> > Can I shortcut the path and do not disturb the maintainer by setting
> > this bug to ASSIGNED?
> 
> It's rare that you can ever do CLOSED NEXTRELEASE on your own
> initiative, because you don't know what the maintainer's intention is.
> You can do CLOSED RAWHIDE in appropriate cases, but this one doesn't
> meet that definition, because the bug is filed on 11, not Rawhide. You
> can't close a bug filed on a stable release as CLOSED RAWHIDE. 

I believe this bug _was_ filed against rawhide before F11 was released,
and then move to F11 by some bug triage sweep. Looks like shooting
yourself in your own foot, if you don't have the power to close the bug
anymore, after you've moved it...

> It's up
> to the maintainer, now, to choose whether he intends to fix this for 11
> as well as Rawhide. If he does, he can make the fix and then do CLOSED
> ERRATA. If he only wants to fix in Rawhide, he can do CLOSED WONTFIX
> with a comment that the bug is fixed in Rawhide but won't be fixed for
> 11.

I've put the bug out of its misery now. Closed rawhide, moving on...