DL listing vs. TX listing

Noriko Mizumoto noriko at redhat.com
Tue Sep 23 06:21:05 UTC 2008


Hi DL and/or TX maintenance teams

I gone through the two listings quickly, and found the following
difference. If there is obsolete modules listed, please kindly remove?
For rest any idea?

[The modules listed on DL but not in TX]
(which means translators can not submit via TX)
- desktop effects
- system-config-display
- system-config-language
- system-switch-java

[The modules listed on TX but not in DL]
(which means translators unlikely work)
- audit-viewer
- libvirt
- liveusb-creator
- mlocate
- newt
- pam
- pam_krb5
- passwd
- pkinit-nss
- redhat-config-language
- revisor
- samadhi
- sectool
- system-config-services
- yumex

Thanks
noriko




More information about the Fedora-trans-list mailing list