[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: DL listing vs. TX listing



I've made the rumpus on irc this morning, and got something below ;-)

Noriko Mizumoto さんは書きました:
> Hi DL and/or TX maintenance teams
> 
> I gone through the two listings quickly, and found the following
> difference. If there is obsolete modules listed, please kindly remove?
> For rest any idea?
> 
> [The modules listed on DL but not in TX]
> (which means translators can not submit via TX)
> - desktop effects
Bug#438033 existed, and needs to be solved by the packager.

> - system-config-display
Bug#438122 existed, and needs to be solved by the packager.

> - system-config-language
Added this module in TX by Dimitris, testing phase.
Bug#463594

> - system-switch-java
Bug#460426 existed, and needs to be solved, which depends on
fedora-infra tkt#826.
Added the comment in tkt#826.

> 
> [The modules listed on TX but not in DL]
> (which means translators unlikely work)

> - redhat-config-language
New bug#463595 reported.

> - system-config-services
This must be essential module to be listed under F10.
New bug#463592 reported by Asgeir.

All bugs are tracked at the tracking bug of #436824.

For rest, those are under 'Various Fedora resources Release'.
To me this seems been neglected. Those many of developers wish to have
their packages translated and have registered with.
Any strategy for those?  How your language team address to those?

cheers
noriko


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]