[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

[Bug 253557] Packaging mercurial extensions



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253557





--- Comment #10 from Neal Becker <ndbecker2 gmail com>  2008-12-03 06:39:30 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Okay. It's coming back to me. The situation was as follows:
> 
> 1. At that time, the fedora package for HG was missing a bunch of stuff. I
> wanted to package the missing bits, HOWEVER
> 2. I knew that several of those pieces were about to be merged upstream, SO
> 3. If I packaged them separately, it was important *not* to put them in hgext,
> because if they got put there they would interfere with the later update of the
> base HG package.
> 
How would it interfere?  This is no different than many other examples:
emacs/site-list, cron.d,  preload.d ...

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]