CMS Decision

[seth vidal]

> Actually, Seth, I'd say that your examples conclusively demonstate
> Elliot's point.  Those pages are scarcely more useful than running a
> search through the wiki.  And since they're not on a sidebar, a user has 
> *no way* of figuring out where they are without visiting one of these 
> pages.

and as I explained - these sidebars are just theme additions. So if you
want to access that data we will need to get the theme changed. But I
bet we don't even know what we want on those sidebars. I bet we end up
with 40 or 50 different variations like those asinine little boxes
slashdot used to have.


> The surface content on Ubuntu's site is certainly well-maintained -- but
> go a couple of layers deep, and it's the same kind of chaos we face,
> Drupal or no Drupal.


Out of curiosity what is it that is broken about our current
infrastructure?

And out of further curiosity - what was it that kept the
fedora.redhat.com from having php running on it? 

-sv