Fedora i18n coordination

[Yoshihiro Totaka]

Hi
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi
> 
>>  Since Fedora embraces many poorly documented breeding edge 
>> technologies such as SELinux and Xen, many other distributions' Linux 
>> users are relying on Fedora's documentation. We need to  focus our 
>> translator's resources on these quality documents.
> 
> 
> Xen, I might agree with you. SELinux is neither bleeding edge nor poorly 
> documented now.
> 

Yes, FC3 SELinux is now well documented. FC4's SELinux is not really 
different from FC3. However with FC5, MCS and MLS stuffs might be 
implemented. It seems FC5 SELinux will have reference-policy instead of 
targeted-policy. 
(https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-selinux-list/2005-November/msg00111.html) 
Existing documents won't be able to cope with FC5 or FC6 SELinux. People 
will be looking Fedora for documentation again.

Fedora is on breeding edge and fedora's documentation really helps 
people adopt new technologies. Technology might be mature when Fedora 
implement the technology, but it often lacks documentation. As long as 
Fedora is the distribution which introduce new technologies to mass, 
fedora documentation's importance will never go away.

-Yoshihiro