Wiki Migration

[Paulo Santos]

Hi all,

Since i'm noticing that some people are already editing and ading pages to
the 'testing' wiki, i just want to give the following warning:

This is a testing environment with the original fedoraproject.org data from
8th of November 2006. Any definite aditions, should still be going under the
current wiki, since i will move that data when we all determine that the new
wiki is ready for prime time.
Also you might have noticed that the RecentChanges are almost empty. Basicly
the RecentChanges are obtained from parsing the event.log of the wiki. And
that log was already 5GB, so i decided to drop that on this testing
environment.

Karsten:
If you guys want to test the new CSS, just let me know where it is and i'll
add a similar Kindofblue template, and replace the appropriate stylesheets
for your testing.


Once again, thanks all
Paulo

On 12/5/06, Karsten Wade <kwade at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 14:06 +0300, John Babich wrote:
>
> > 1. Is the move back to fedora.redhat.com a temporary situation for
> testing?
>
> Paul explained this fine; it's just a test/sandbox environment.  We are
> definitely leaving fedora.redhat.com behind. :)
>
> > 2. Are we still going with Plone for static pages and MoinMoin wiki
> > for drafts, etc.?
>
> This is the way the Documentation Project is going to use Wiki + CMS.
> However, I fully expect the rest of the project to use the Wiki as a
> primary location for project-specific documentation, e.g. Packaging/,
> SELinux/, Extras/, etc.
>
> However, once we build the tools to easily publish to Plone, we'll see
> if some folks want to use that. :)
>
> > By the way, I'm intrigued by the "Render as Docbook" feature.
> >
> > 3. Is there a way to generate our valid DocBook XML code with this
> facility?
>
> What you see in this Moin Moin instance, ver. 1.5.6, is the code
> *before* the Google Summer of Code fixes this year.  It actually works
> well for most cases, but has some bugs and unsupported syntax.  The code
> that was worked on over this GSoC fixed the bugs and did a number of
> syntax mappings that we devised.  So, for example, the markup in
> WikiEditing#Marking_Technical_Terms is rendered in to the XML that we
> expect it to.
>
> We are working with the same FI/Websites team to get upgraded to 1.6
> when it is released, as well as working on getting the GSoC code into
> that main trunk.  In the meantime, the Render as DocBook in 1.5.6 works
> good enough for us to use for one-time conversions out of the Wiki, etc.
>
> - Karsten
> --
> Karsten Wade, RHCE, 108 Editor    ^     Fedora Documentation Project
> Sr. Developer Relations Mgr.     |  fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
>    quaid.108.redhat.com           |          gpg key: AD0E0C41
> ////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
>
>
> --
> Fedora-websites-list mailing list
> Fedora-websites-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-websites-list
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-websites-list/attachments/20061206/9d96f748/attachment.htm>