[PATCH] Make it clear that 'Hash: SHA1' does not specify the checksum hash

Todd Zullinger tmz at pobox.com
Thu Nov 19 22:37:25 UTC 2009


Ricky Zhou wrote:
> Tiny thing, I'd use <emph> instead of <i> for this.

Sure, my HTML tag knowledge is so out of date.  In the same vein, is
<strong> preferable to <b> these days?

> Also, it might be good to place this above the checksum links at
> least for those that just click the links immediately.

I'll move it to the top then, where it ought to stand out.

> While we're making changes to this page, there's also the issue that
> http://docs.fedoraproject.org/readme-burning-isos/en_US/sn-validating-files.html
> is woefully out of date and still references SHA1 for those that
> click on the Windows user link :-(
>
> Not what can really be done abou that last bit though.

Actually, if it weren't for the string freeze and me getting really
busy the past few weeks, I'd have finished up adding the sha25sum.exe
and we could have updated those instructions or the link.  I believe
Eric Christensen was ready to help from the docs side one I get the
Windows binary uploaded.

This is part of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/527060

-- 
Todd        OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Money can't buy happiness, but it sure makes living in misery easier.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 542 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-websites-list/attachments/20091119/b70511dc/attachment.sig>


More information about the Fedora-websites-list mailing list