[Fedora-xen] HVM Performance and PV drivers
Pasi Kärkkäinen
pasik at iki.fi
Fri Feb 9 17:25:20 UTC 2007
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 09:40:50PM -0800, Jim Klein wrote:
>
> On Thursday 08 February 2007 10:08am, Jim Klein wrote:
> > Anyone been able to get the PV drivers from Xensource to work on an
> > FC6 created HVM. Performance is rather sluggish, even on 64bit,
> > without these, yet they don't seem to want to work here. Or,
> > alternatively, is Red Hat working on their own? The HVM IO is really
> > a bit too slow for most production use without them.
>
>
> On Thu, 8 Feb 2007 11:26am, Lamont Peterson wrote:
> > I don't believe that you can do this.
> >
> >But, I'm wondering what OS you're trying to run on the HVM DomU. If it's
> >Linux, use a paravirtualized DomU. You'll get much better performance
> >(especially on things like I/O).
> >
> >HVM adds some emulation overhead and, thus, is slower than PV. HVM is only
> >necessary to run an OS for which no paravirtualized kernel is available.
> >--
> >Lamont Peterson <lamont at gurulabs.com>
> >Senior Instructor
> >Guru Labs, L.C. [ http://www.GuruLabs.com/ ]
>
> All my Linux guests are PV (been running Xen in production for 7 months - far longer
> in testing.) I'm talking about Windows guests, which is why I would need PV drivers to work.
> Am running 64bit Dom0 to alleviate some of the pain, but I/O is still too slow for anything
> but lightweight applications. We're a RHEL shop, so would prefer to use RHEL as a base over
> XenSource Commercial, but it looks like I may have to go that route if noone else is working
> on PV drivers for Windows guests.
>
Interesting point is the fact that Novell will ship Windows PV drivers in
SLES 10 SP1 when it's released in May 2007..
-- Pasi
More information about the Fedora-xen
mailing list