[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [Fedora-xen] f10 x86_64 xen VM guests fail to boot on f8 host



Hi Mark,

I ran the adjusted commands on our system here with the Intel CPU (which crashes in the same way as Jon's machine):

[root office64 boot]# /usr/lib64/xen/bin/xenctx -s System.map-2.6.27.9-159.fc10.x86_64 114

rip: ffffffff8100b8a2 set_page_prot+0x6d
rsp: ffffffff81575f08
rax: ffffffea   rbx: 000016e4   rcx: 00000055   rdx: 00000000
rsi: 800000010c2b3061   rdi: ffffffff816e4000   rbp: ffffffff81575f68
 r8: 0000000f    r9: ffffffff817ee350   r10: ffffffff817ee550   r11: 00000010
r12: ffffffff816e4000   r13: 800000010c2b3061   r14: 8000000000000161   r15: 00002c00
 cs: 0000e033    ds: 00000000    fs: 00000000    gs: 00000000

Stack:
 0000000000000055 0000000000000010 ffffffff8100b8a2 000000010000e030
 0000000000010082 ffffffff81575f48 000000000000e02b ffffffff8100b89e
 0000000000000200 ffffffff816e7000 0000000000000800 0000000000000016
 ffffffff81575ff8 ffffffff815a5c60 0000000000002c00 0000000000000000

Code:
df 54 1d 00 4c 89 e7 4c 89 ee 31 d2 e8 22 d9 ff ff 85 c0 74 04 <0f> 0b eb fe 5b 41 5c 41 5d 41 5e

Call Trace:
  [<ffffffff8100b8a2>] set_page_prot+0x6d <--
  [<ffffffff8100b8a2>] set_page_prot+0x6d
  [<ffffffff8100b89e>] set_page_prot+0x69
  [<ffffffff815a5c60>] xen_start_kernel+0x5dd

Cheers hope this helps
Phill

On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 10:33 +0000, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> Hi Jon,
> 
> On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 18:02 +0900, Jon Swanson wrote:
> > This is a cross post of the same subject on the Fedora Forums.  If this
> > is bad practice let me know and i'll never do it again.
> 
> Mailing lists can often be a better way to get help from developers, so
> posting here is no problem.
> 
> Also, fedora-virt redhat com might be a better place to post questions
> these days - it's not clear whether the fedora-xen list has a future.
> 
> > Additional log info is available at
> > http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?p=1149972&posted=1#post1149
> > 972
> > 
> > I have two machines running fresh installs of f8 with the xen. Kernel
> > and all software versions are the same on both.
> 
> You've seen this then, right?
> 
>    http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Bugs/F10Common#Installing_Fedora_10_DomU_on_Fedora_8_Dom0_Fails
> 
> > /var/log/xen/xend.log relevant output:
> > 
> > [2009-01-16 14:45:32 4120] DEBUG (DevController:150) Waiting for devices
> > vtpm.
> > [2009-01-16 14:45:32 4120] INFO (XendDomain:1130) Domain f10testB (21)
> > unpaused.
> > [2009-01-16 14:45:32 4120] WARNING (XendDomainInfo:1203) Domain has
> > crashed: name=f10testB id=21.
> > [2009-01-16 14:45:32 4120] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:1802)
> > XendDomainInfo.destroy: domid=21
> > [2009-01-16 14:45:32 4120] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:1821)
> > XendDomainInfo.destroyDomain(21)
> > I've also tried moving a functional guest from MachineA to MachineB to
> > boot it there, with the same results. Guest will not boot on MachineB.
> > 
> > f8 64bit guests will boot on MachineB with no problems.
> > f10 32bit guests will boot on MachineB with no problems.
> > 
> > Only 64bit machines seem to be borked.
> 
> Okay, sounds like it might "just" be a F10 kernel bug.
> 
> Try doing this to get a stack trace:
> 
>   1) Set "on_crash=preserve" in your domain config
> 
>   2) Copy the guest kernel's System.map to the host
> 
>   2) Once the guest has crashed, run:
> 
>        /usr/lib/xen/bin/xenctx -s System.map <domid>      
> 
> Cheers,
> Mark.
> 
> --
> Fedora-xen mailing list
> Fedora-xen redhat com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen
> 


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]