[Freeipa-devel] [PATCH] Clients subpackage

Martin Nagy mnagy at redhat.com
Mon Mar 9 12:18:18 UTC 2009


Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Sun, 2009-03-08 at 10:13 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >> Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >>> On Sun, 2009-03-08 at 14:36 +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >>>> This patch splits the sssd rpm into sssd and sssd-client as
> >>>> discussed on IRC and in the review request.
> >>>>
> >>>> The -client package now contains the userspace tools as well as
> >>>> the NSS and PAM libraries (i.e. stuff built from sssd/sss_client
> >>>> subdirectory)
> >>>>
> >>> This incarnation of the patch also moves the ldconig calls in
> >>> %post and %postun into %post client and %postun client
> >>>
> >> Ack and pushed to master.
> > 
> > Sorry but I really do not understand why the packages have been
> > actually split.
> > 
> > The clients can't work without the daemon and the daemon is
> > unmanageable without the client.
> > 
> > So what for ?
> > 
> > Simo.
> > 
> 
> The package reviewer demanded it, and since we're on a really tight
> schedule for getting this package out, we acquiesced. We can have a
> protracted argument about the merits of one vs. two packages after we
> meet our deadline. Right now, the reviewer gets whatever he wants.
> 
> My 2 cents, anyway.

Sorry, this is a misunderstanding. In the review, I should have made it
clear that it was only a suggestion. I saw 'client' and 'server' and
immediately thought they should be separate. Instead I should have just
asked if this wouldn't be a good idea. If the situation is as Simo
says then by all means, let's don't split the package. Or let's split
it in a way that makes sense. So, sorry for the confusion.

Martin




More information about the Freeipa-devel mailing list