[Freeipa-devel] [PATCH] 1051 Fix CS replica management

[Rob Crittenden]

Jan Cholasta wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Dne 31.8.2012 19:43, Rob Crittenden napsal(a):
>> The naming in CS replication agreements is different from IPA
>> agreements, we have to live with what the create. The master side should
>> be on the local side, replica1, not the remote. This required reversing
>> a few master variables.
>>
>> Pass in the force flag to del_link.
>>
>> Do a better job of finding the agreements on each side.
>>
>> This should be ipa-csreplica-manage more in line with ipa-replica-manage.
>>
>> rob
>>
>
> Rob, can you please rebase the patch on top of current master? There
> were some dogtag 10 related changes to ipa-csreplica-manage since you
> posted the patch.
>
> Honza
>

I re-tested after the merge and found some problems with my initial 
approach. The problem stems from the naming convention that dogtag uses 
when creating the initial agreements. It is hard to predict how things 
were set up later so rather than trying to reconstruct the DN we search 
for it and pass it when deleting agreements.

rob
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: freeipa-rcrit-1051-2-csmanage.patch
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 9696 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/freeipa-devel/attachments/20120920/2df68507/attachment.bin>