[Freeipa-devel] [PATCH] 0051 Handle --subject option in ipa-server-install

Petr Viktorin pviktori at redhat.com
Thu Aug 1 13:15:41 UTC 2013


On 08/01/2013 02:58 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
> On 08/01/2013 02:54 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
>> On 07/31/2013 11:51 AM, Ana Krivokapic wrote:
>>> On 07/30/2013 06:24 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
>>>> On 07/30/2013 10:27 AM, Ana Krivokapic wrote:
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> This patch addresses ticket https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/3783.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for the patch, I have a concern below:
>>>>
>>>>> freeipa-akrivoka-0051-Handle-subject-option-in-ipa-server-install.patch
>>>>> diff --git a/install/tools/ipa-upgradeconfig b/install/tools/ipa-upgradeconfig
>>>>> index
>>>>> de17c5b23d79f31e8571a3400d44397630cadada..a2625e6198bcff0811c482e479c8af10716dcea1
>>>>>
>>>>> 100644
>>>>> --- a/install/tools/ipa-upgradeconfig
>>>>> +++ b/install/tools/ipa-upgradeconfig
>>>>> @@ -894,6 +895,7 @@ def main():
>>>>>         configured_constants = dogtag.configured_constants()
>>>>>         sub_dict = dict(
>>>>>             REALM=api.env.realm,
>>>>> +        SUBJECT_BASE=str(DN(('O', api.env.realm))),
>>>>
>>>> When certmap.conf.template's version changes again, this will rewrite the
>>>> subject to the default. Don't we want to use the subject base also here?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> You are right. The updated patch uses the current value of subject base from
>>> LDAP to update certmap.conf during upgrades.
>>
>> When ipa-upgradeconfig is run while the DS is down, this results in a small
>> warning, and very bad configuration:
>>      certmap ipaca           CN=Certificate Authority,None
>>
>>
>> I'm not sure how this should be handled. I'm adding Rob to the loop.
>> Rob, can we start the DS in ipa-upgradeconfig? That sounds quite heavy-handed
>> for a RPM upgrade script.
>>
>> Maybe if the DS is unavailable, we should use the old value from the config
>> file itself.
>
> Values can be stored/restored using a sysupgrade module.

The problem is that (AFAIK) old instances won't have this particular 
value stored. Upgrading from 3.1 to a future version where certmap.conf 
is modified again would fail.

> I would not be so
> afraid of starting the DS module, we already do that exercise in
> ipa-ldap-updater, so adding it in ipa-upgradeconfig too does not change much.
>
> Question is, what should we do what DS cannot be started or cannot be read
> (e.g. when upgrade is run in fedup's chrooted environment) - we must make sure
> we don't mess the configuration up.

Again AFAIK, if the server is down, certmap.conf is the only place where 
this value is available. I didn't check thoroughly, though.


-- 
Petr³




More information about the Freeipa-devel mailing list