[Freeipa-devel] FreeIPA server package group

[Tomas Babej]

On 08/29/2013 11:55 AM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
> On 08/28/2013 12:20 PM, Tomas Babej wrote:
>> On 08/28/2013 12:03 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
>>> On 08/28/2013 11:46 AM, Tomas Babej wrote:
>>>> On 08/26/2013 10:14 AM, Tomas Babej wrote:
>>>>> On Mon 26 Aug 2013 10:12:09 AM CEST, Petr Vobornik wrote:
>>>>>> On 08/26/2013 09:54 AM, Tomas Babej wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I cooked up a patch for comps that adds a FreeIPA package group.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please chime in if you're OK with package selection / description.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> For illustration, see the attached image. FreeIPA will be added 
>>>>>>> as an
>>>>>>> add-on in an installer under the Infrastructure server environment,
>>>>>>> that means, in the included images it will be at the same level
>>>>>>> as DNS or FTP server.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It will also appear in the Software Selection tool (PackageKit).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It should also be available under as yum groupinstall "FreeIPA
>>>>>>> server",
>>>>>>> and in PackageKit, as I understand comps is also source for that 
>>>>>>> too.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_use_and_edit_comps.xml_for_package_groups 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/3630
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> IMO the Audit part in the description is false advertisement. Same
>>>>>> issue is in package descriptions.
>>>>>
>>>>> I know, it's taken directly from there.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'd rather have it consistent, if we're going to change it here, we
>>>>> should do
>>>>> there too, so that we do not end up with multiple (seemingly
>>>>> incomplete)
>>>>> descriptions at various places.
>>>>
>>>> Anybody else does have any other concerns? We need to move with this
>>>> effort since string freeze for F20 is coming.
>>>>
>>>> I'm particulary dubious about including the freeipa-tests package.
>>>
>>> I don't think that should be included, developer tests are unnecessary
>>> for a server.
>>>
>> It was marked as optional in the initial proposal, but I agree it's
>> unnecessary for
>> it to be there at all.
>>>> We discussed the A (as Audit) part in the description with Rob. The
>>>> fact is
>>>> that this is taken from the freeipa-server package description and
>>>> nobody
>>>> complained in 7 years.
>>>
>>
>> Updated tests attached.
>>
>
> Oh, one more thing I remembered just now -- is it too late?
> We should include bind-dyndb-ldap (which pulls in bind). Preferably as 
> default.
>

I included it there.

If anyone else wants to chime in, please do now, I'll create a ticket 
with rel-eng at the end of the day.

-- 
Tomas Babej
Associate Software Engeneer | Red Hat | Identity Management
RHCE | Brno Site | IRC: tbabej | freeipa.org

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: comps-tbabej-0001-3-Add-FreeIPA-server-package-group.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 3245 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/freeipa-devel/attachments/20130829/993d3b55/attachment.bin>