[Freeipa-devel] [PATCH] Fix python setup tools license tags

[Simo Sorce]

On Thu, 2013-12-05 at 15:29 +0100, Petr Vobornik wrote:
> On 5.12.2013 14:09, Petr Viktorin wrote:
> > On 12/03/2013 03:26 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> >> Some tags escaped the relicensing we did a long time ago.
> >>
> >> Simo.
> >
> > Looks good, ACK, pushed to:
> > master: af26e6da4650b3a429af31bc38b546eff27e38c6
> > ipa-3-3: 9defb913aa65bfe9b423d510f340ae23b9e547f2
> >
> >
> >
> > I grepped for some other occurences of "GPLv2":
> >
> > contrib/RHEL4/ipa-client.spec:7:License:        GPLv2
> > do we still want to carry the RHEL4 stuff anyway?
> >
> > ipa-client/ipa-client.spec.in:7:License:        GPLv2
> > Is ipa-client.spec used for anything any more?
> >
> >
> > install/ui/src/freeipa/package.json:
> >      "licenses": [{
> >          "type": "GPLv3",
> >          "url": "http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.html"
> >      },{
> >          "type": "GPLv2",
> >          "url": "http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.html"
> >      }],
> > Is this package dual-licensed?
> >
> 
> It's because of:
>   git grep "Free Software Foundation; version 2"
> install/ui/src/freeipa/aci.js: * published by the Free Software 
> Foundation; version 2 only
> install/ui/test/aci_tests.js: * published by the Free Software 
> Foundation; version 2 only
> install/ui/test/widget_tests.js: * published by the Free Software 
> Foundation; version 2 only
> 
> 
> It's most likely a mistake and should be changed.

Is that code really v2 only ?

Or are you saying the "version 2 only" strings are mistakes ?

Simo.

-- 
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York