[Freeipa-devel] [PATCH] Fix python setup tools license tags

[Petr Vobornik]

On 5.12.2013 15:34, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-12-05 at 15:29 +0100, Petr Vobornik wrote:
>> On 5.12.2013 14:09, Petr Viktorin wrote:
>>> On 12/03/2013 03:26 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
>>>> Some tags escaped the relicensing we did a long time ago.
>>>>
>>>> Simo.
>>>
>>> Looks good, ACK, pushed to:
>>> master: af26e6da4650b3a429af31bc38b546eff27e38c6
>>> ipa-3-3: 9defb913aa65bfe9b423d510f340ae23b9e547f2
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I grepped for some other occurences of "GPLv2":
>>>
>>> contrib/RHEL4/ipa-client.spec:7:License:        GPLv2
>>> do we still want to carry the RHEL4 stuff anyway?
>>>
>>> ipa-client/ipa-client.spec.in:7:License:        GPLv2
>>> Is ipa-client.spec used for anything any more?
>>>
>>>
>>> install/ui/src/freeipa/package.json:
>>>       "licenses": [{
>>>           "type": "GPLv3",
>>>           "url": "http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.html"
>>>       },{
>>>           "type": "GPLv2",
>>>           "url": "http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.html"
>>>       }],
>>> Is this package dual-licensed?
>>>
>>
>> It's because of:
>>    git grep "Free Software Foundation; version 2"
>> install/ui/src/freeipa/aci.js: * published by the Free Software
>> Foundation; version 2 only
>> install/ui/test/aci_tests.js: * published by the Free Software
>> Foundation; version 2 only
>> install/ui/test/widget_tests.js: * published by the Free Software
>> Foundation; version 2 only
>>
>>
>> It's most likely a mistake and should be changed.
>
> Is that code really v2 only ?
>
> Or are you saying the "version 2 only" strings are mistakes ?
>
> Simo.
>

It's our code. So IMO we should just change it to v3.

--
Petr Vobornik