[Freeipa-users] IPA Startup issues

Sigbjorn Lie sigbjorn at nixtra.com
Mon May 16 14:44:34 UTC 2011


On 05/16/2011 04:25 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
> Sigbjorn Lie wrote:
>> On 05/16/2011 03:41 PM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
>>> On 05/14/2011 10:46 AM, Sigbjorn Lie wrote:
>>>> I've noticed that if the machine running IPA is very busy at startup,
>>>> the IPA services will not be online when the machine is started.
>>>>
>>>> I noticed this is as my test virtualization host has had it's power
>>>> cord knocked out a few times. When I restart the host machine, all the
>>>> virtual machines is started at the same time, causing (a lot) higher
>>>> than normal latency for each virtual machine.
>>>>
>>>> This causes the IPA daemons to start, while during the startup one or
>>>> several IPA daemons fails due to dependencies of other daemons which
>>>> is not started yet, and all the IPA daemons is stopped as not all the
>>>> IPA daemons started successfully. I've noticed that the default
>>>> behavior of the ipactl command is to shut down all the IPA daemons, if
>>>> any of the IPA daemons should fail during startup.
>>>>
>>>> This can be seen in the logs of the individual services, as some is
>>>> started successfully, just to receive a shutdown signal shortly after.
>>>> It seem to be the pki-ca which shut down my IPA services this morning.
>>>>
>>>> When rebooting the virtual machine running the IPA daemons during
>>>> normal load of the host machine, all the IPA daemons start
>>>> successfully. Logging on to the IPA server and manually starting the
>>>> IPA daemons after the load of the host machine has decreased also 
>>>> works.
>>>>
>>>> I suggest changing the startup scripts to allow (a lot) longer startup
>>>> times for the IPA daemons prior to failing them.
>>>
>>> F15 introduced new way to start daemons and define dependencies.
>>> We have in our plans to port IPA to use systemd in F16. This will have
>>> implications on the architecture of the service startup in general and
>>> most likely will affect the current way of starting services too.
>>>
>>
>> This was RHEL 6.1beta I tested at. I presume it will be some time before
>> systemd will make it's way into RHEL? What can be done in the meantime
>> for IPA in RHEL?
>
> Can you be more specific which services didn't start?

Please see my previous post when replying to Simo Sorce.


Rgds,
Siggi




More information about the Freeipa-users mailing list