[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [Freeipa-users] FreeIPA and others




Yeah you are right. Basically now our network does not have a overall user authentication module such as OpenLPAD or 389. I was looking around for a better solution that could work on Win + Linux environment. At the same time it should be so painful to setup that I have invest weeks of my full efforts to get it run.

Thanks
Chandan





On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Steven Jones <Steven Jones vuw ac nz> wrote:
Hi,

>From a user perspective such as myself,

If its mission critical and complex need today then you need to also look at more mature solutions. These however will cost you a lot of time and money to deploy. We have been there and the costs are obscene and the support worryingly poor in AP.  Since you have only mentioned 389 and Openldap as options I suspect IPA will suit you its the best of the three, so take a look.

regards

Steven Jones

Technical Specialist - Linux RHCE

Victoria University, Wellington, NZ

0064 4 463 6272


From: freeipa-users-bounces redhat com [freeipa-users-bounces redhat com] on behalf of Chandan Kumar [chandank kumar gmail com]
Sent: Saturday, 12 May 2012 6:18 a.m.
To: Freeipa-users redhat com
Subject: [Freeipa-users] FreeIPA and others

Hi All,

I was considering different centralized authentication/authorization services such as FreeIPA, 389 and Open ldap to deploy into our network in order to have a good centralized user authentication/authorization machanism. I was wondering what are they key that FreeIPA provides as compared to other directory servies in terms of extra feature, ease of deployment and use etc.

Thanks
Chandan




_______________________________________________
Freeipa-users mailing list
Freeipa-users redhat com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]