[K12OSN] k12LTSP and static IP
Kevin Boone
keboone39 at hotmail.com
Mon Feb 23 19:03:01 UTC 2004
I like this setup. I will try it.
When I said I wanted to runn k12LTSP apps I mean running the apps within the
GNOME desktop envirnment. Can that be done with this setup?
>From: "Terrell Prude', Jr." <microman at cmosnetworks.com>
>Reply-To: k12osn at redhat.com
>To: k12osn at redhat.com
>Subject: Re: [K12OSN] k12LTSP and static IP
>Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 18:21:30 -0500
>
>Then consider what I do, which is run a single-NIC K12LTSP server, like
>this:
>
> REALLY BIG WAN
> |
> |
> Router
> (Cisco 3600)
> |
> |
>-------------------------------------------- MAIN LAN
> | | | | (say, 10.40.0.0/20)
>K12LTSP K12LTSP Win2K DHCP
>Client Server Client Server
> (10.40.0.254)
>
>
>In this scenario, we make sure that dhcpd does *NOT* start when the system
>comes up. That means doing chkconfig on dhcpd, like so:
>
> chkconfig --level 2345 dhcpd off
>
>If for some reason that doesn´t work for you, then we do it manually. Go
>into these directories:
>
> /etc/rc.d/rc2.d
> /etc/rc.d/rc3.d
> /etc/rc.d/rc4.d
> /etc/rc.d/rc5.d
>
>and rename Sxxdhcpd to Kxxdhcpd, where ¨xx¨ is some number. On my system,
>it´s S65dhcpd, for example. I renamed it to K65dhcpd in _all four_ of
>these directories. Double check that it´s done in all four. Really.
>
>My K12LTSP server, you will note, is running in a single-NIC configuration
>on a switched (Catalyst 3500) network, and the K12LTSP server has Gig-E
>fiber. A Bay/Nortel 350T or 450T switch w/ the Gig-E interface will work
>equally well. Since I happen to run the infrastructure, I´m therefore the
>administrator for DHCP too, so I can add the LTSP stuff to the scope
>myself. If you´re not so fortunate, then just ask your DHCP admin to add
>that stuff to the existing DHCP server´s scope. Yes, it does work, and no,
>you won´t have any DHCP issues. The Windows boxes will simply ignore the
>TFTP and NFS stuff when the OS boots. With one tweak, this is exactly how
>I run it, my tweak being that the Cisco 3600 is itself the DHCP server
>(yep, they can do that).
>
>--TP
>
>Kevin Boone wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>>This is good....yes win2k machines would be mapped to the k12box via UNC
>>path,shortcut on the desktop etc....to the executable that would k12linux
>>gui, programs etc on the win2k machine.
>>
>>I didn't want the win2k machines to pick up "new" ip addresses...unless it
>>can be done without setting the k12ltsp server to run dhcp. Our school
>>is already running a dhcp server, I've been told that I cannot put a dhcp
>>server on the school network for the obvious reasons.
>>
>>
>>
>>>From: "Terrell Prude', Jr." <microman at cmosnetworks.com>
>>>Reply-To: k12osn at redhat.com
>>>To: k12osn at redhat.com
>>>Subject: Re: [K12OSN] k12LTSP and static IP
>>>Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 15:38:54 -0500
>>>
>>>Having to make a few assumptions here. Do you mean kind of like this?
>>>
>>> Win2K Win2K Win2K
>>> | | |
>>>-------------------------- MAIN LAN (say, 10.40.0.0/20)
>>> |
>>> |
>>> | 10.40.0.200
>>> K12LTSP
>>> Server | 192.168.0.254
>>> |
>>> |
>>>---------------------------- K12LTSP LAN
>>> | | | 192.168.0.0/24
>>>K12LTSP K12LTSP K12LTSP
>>>Client Client Client
>>>
>>>
>>>In this scenario, folks would hit Network Neighborhood / My Network
>>>Places from the Win boxes, find a share called, say,
>>>\\K12LTSPBOX\coolapps\AdobeAcrobat, where acrord32.exe lives, and run it
>>>from there. They may also have a desktop shortcut pointing to this UNC
>>>path, or maybe a mapped drive (say, N:\AdobeAcrobat).
>>>
>>>Is this what you have in mind? If I´m off base here, please correct me.
>>>
>>>--TP
>>>
>>>Kevin Boone wrote:
>>>
>>>>Sort of in the reverse of attaching to a MS Terminal server with
>>>>rdesktop...win 2K machines would point to the k12 TS and run apps on it.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>From: "Terrell Prude', Jr." <microman at cmosnetworks.com>
>>>>>Reply-To: k12osn at redhat.com
>>>>>To: k12osn at redhat.com
>>>>>Subject: Re: [K12OSN] k12LTSP and static IP
>>>>>Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 23:17:27 -0500
>>>>>
>>>>>Kevin Boone wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Can the TS work the same if it were given a static IP address? In
>>>>>>other word, can we point the clients to the server IP to run ltsp?
>>>>>>
>>>>>Not sure what you mean here. The TS should always have a static IP
>>>>>address itself, and by default, it does on the ¨inside¨ interface
>>>>>(assumes a two-NIC installation). You have to have something
>>>>>consistent for your clients to point to, for both the TFTP server and
>>>>>the NFS server.
>>>>>
>>>>>Do you mean giving the clients themselves static IP addresses?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>K12OSN mailing list
>K12OSN at redhat.com
>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/k12osn
>For more info see <http://www.k12os.org>
_________________________________________________________________
Click, drag and drop. My MSN is the simple way to design your homepage.
http://click.atdmt.com/AVE/go/onm00200364ave/direct/01/
More information about the K12OSN
mailing list