[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [K12OSN] flushing out my backlog... testing for version 4.1.1, followed by 3.2.0, then a 4.2.0 test build

On Thu, 30 Sep 2004, Chris Thomas wrote:

>What are some of the differences between Centos and
>WBEL besides the sync times?

In theory? Both strive to be 100% compatible with RHEL,
so they should be 100% compatible with each other.

In practice, they differ a little. By default, WB will
upgrade a K12LTSP server, Centos won't (I'll fix that).
I think the color scheme for Centos is ugly ;-)
Relatively insignificant differences.

Another big plus for Centos is that some of the people
on this list are also on the Centos lists. There does
not appear to be much cross-pollination between K12LTSP
and WB. 


>--- Eric Harrison <eharrison mail mesd k12 or us>
>> I'm also fairly close to having a K12LTSP 3.2.0 beta
>> available. I have
>> been investigating moving from WhiteBox to Centos.
>> Centos seems to be
>> doing a better job at keeping in sync with RHEL,
>> which is important to
>> me since I'm working on RHEL boxes at work...

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]