[katello-devel] Custom type or Yum

[Bryan Kearney]

On 07/29/2011 10:34 AM, Brad Buckingham wrote:
> On 07/29/2011 10:22 AM, Bryan Kearney wrote:
>> On 07/29/2011 10:11 AM, Todd Sanders wrote:
>>> On 07/29/2011 09:54 AM, Jason Rist wrote:
>>>> On 07/29/2011 07:45 AM, Bryan Kearney wrote:
>>>>> WHat should the provider be called... "custom" or "yum"?
>>>>>
>>>>> -- bk
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> katello-devel mailing list
>>>>> katello-devel at redhat.com
>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/katello-devel
>>>> Custom
>>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> We will eventually support multiple content types per provider.
>>>
>>
>>
>> ok.. so which do we want, today the cli has a model which is :
>>
>> create a provider of type "Yum".
>> Add yum repos.
>>
>> The GUI seems to have a model of
>>
>> Create a provider of type "Custom"
>> Add product which are of type yum
>>
>> Just need to be consistent. So, where do I put the bug?
>>
>> -- bk
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> katello-devel mailing list
>> katello-devel at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/katello-devel
> In the UI today, it is correct that the provider type may be of Custom
> or Red Hat.
>
> For a custom provider, when a product is created, there is also a type
> that may be selected for the individual product. Today, the options are
> File and Yum. That said, these were placeholders and are not currently
> used by the implementation.
>

I will put a task to change the name in the cli, but I would suggest we 
remove "placeholder" items which are on the main story path.

-- bk