[katello-devel] provider URL: reverted a few changes

Lukas Zapletal lzap at redhat.com
Fri May 20 06:08:09 UTC 2011


On 05/20/2011 12:47 AM, Bryan Kearney wrote:
> If this is just for RedHat providers, then I think that the manifest
> should have it embedded or it should be coded in the app (config file).
>
> Now.. should we support using the same Provider type for upstream
> candlepins? If so, that negates the idea of the config file.. but may be
> that we add it into the maniest.

Hey,

sorry for that. I was really in doubt about this user story and did not 
test sync at the end of the day.

This is an example when all unit tests are green (data looks good in 
Katello), but integration tests show substantional failure. I will add 
more simple integration tests into my script which I run before push. 
Unit tests are simply not enough.

@Bryan - Putting these patches aside until we resolve how to proceed 
further.

-- 
Later,

  Lukas Zapletal | E32E400A
  RHN Satellite Engineering
  Red Hat Czech s.r.o. Brno




More information about the katello-devel mailing list