[katello-devel] provider URL: reverted a few changes
Lukas Zapletal
lzap at redhat.com
Fri May 20 06:08:09 UTC 2011
On 05/20/2011 12:47 AM, Bryan Kearney wrote:
> If this is just for RedHat providers, then I think that the manifest
> should have it embedded or it should be coded in the app (config file).
>
> Now.. should we support using the same Provider type for upstream
> candlepins? If so, that negates the idea of the config file.. but may be
> that we add it into the maniest.
Hey,
sorry for that. I was really in doubt about this user story and did not
test sync at the end of the day.
This is an example when all unit tests are green (data looks good in
Katello), but integration tests show substantional failure. I will add
more simple integration tests into my script which I run before push.
Unit tests are simply not enough.
@Bryan - Putting these patches aside until we resolve how to proceed
further.
--
Later,
Lukas Zapletal | E32E400A
RHN Satellite Engineering
Red Hat Czech s.r.o. Brno
More information about the katello-devel
mailing list