[katello-devel] Bundler vs rpm-gems

[Petr Chalupa]

How much you would bet me? :) I'll already hit problems related to this. 
That's why I think its important.

Petr

On 22.08.12 15:05, Lukas Zapletal wrote:
> Well, this is *very* rare. The alpha and omega of security patch is that
> you always patch the absolute minimum, just to avoid the security
> problem. No functionality should be changed.
>
> I think we can perfectly live without security patches. I bet we wont
> hit any problem in regard to this in five years. But Vit should confirm
> this, he is the right guy :-)
>
> LZ
>
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 02:54:46PM +0200, Petr Chalupa wrote:
>> I know but those new versions sometimes have different behavior than
>> the old version. As a developer I would like to be as close as
>> possible to fedora environment even if I am on mac/ubuntu/debian.
>> It's particularly useful when you bug-fixing and you avoid
>> situations when you unintentionally use a feature from the new
>> version of gem which will break katello on fedora/rhel.
>>
>> Petr
>>
>> On 22.08.12 14:44, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>>> Dne 22.8.2012 14:32, Petr Chalupa napsal(a):
>>>> We should not drop our gem-repo, we would not be able to provide gem
>>>> with patches from rpms to non fedora/rhel systems (I and any other non
>>>> fedora developer need those to be able to reasonable fix bugs).
>>>>
>>>> Petr
>>>>
>>>
>>> Please excuse me, but what is the purpose of gem-repo *with patches*?
>>> Security issues are typically fixed in latest versions of gems, which in
>>> turn should be available in Fedora Rawhide, so am I missing something?
>>>
>>>
>>> Vit
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> katello-devel mailing list
>>> katello-devel at redhat.com
>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/katello-devel
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> katello-devel mailing list
>> katello-devel at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/katello-devel
>