[katello-devel] pulp 1.1 will disallow i18n names for repos... what does that mean for Katello???

Eric Helms ehelms at redhat.com
Tue Jun 26 15:32:28 UTC 2012


On 06/26/2012 11:15 AM, Bryan Kearney wrote:
> On 06/26/2012 11:13 AM, Justin Sherrill wrote:
>> On 06/26/2012 10:52 AM, Bryan Kearney wrote:
>>> On 06/26/2012 10:48 AM, Og Maciel wrote:
>>>> It all started with this Bz i filed this morning:
>>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835586
>>>>
>>>> Then Preethi pointed me to
>>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817914
>>>>
>>>> Which then pointed to my discussion in #pulp which can be seen (most
>>>> of it) here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835586#c3
>>>>
>>>> The bottom line: are we going to disallow users from creating i18n
>>>> organizations now???
>>>>
>>> Can we urlencode the i18n characters and have it JustWork(tm)? That
>>> seems like a much friendlier model.
>>
>> We could do something like that, although it would make it really
>> unreadable, and at that point we may not even want to include it in the
>> name.
>>
>> is having something like:  m%C3%A1n%C3%A1%C3%B1a   in a repo name really
>> helpful?
>
>
> I dunno, I might prefer that if i can get the org and product names to 
> be in my native language.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> -- bk
>
> _______________________________________________
> katello-devel mailing list
> katello-devel at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/katello-devel
Do we really need to be storing the repository name in Pulp?  Why not 
generate some unique identifier?

I would think all that matters is some way to connect the Katello 
repository model to the Pulp via some sort of identifier so that we can 
retrieve the information we need about it.  And then store the user 
defined "name" in Katello.

- Eric




More information about the katello-devel mailing list