[katello-devel] Checking in Gemfile.lock files

[David Davis]

Unfortunately I wasn't able to solve this problem. I was working on a gem that would check each Gemfile.lock and make sure each gem is in the corresponding Fedora/EPEL repo though:

https://github.com/daviddavis/pkgwat

I'm not sure how worthwhile it'll be unless we can solve the dependency stuff since it'll always throw warnings if our dependency gems don't match. Btw, it's based on a F18 tool for checking packages and getting package info:

https://github.com/ralphbean/pkgwat.cli

The package is called pkgwat.

David

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Petr Chalupa" <pchalupa at redhat.com>
> To: katello-devel at redhat.com
> Sent: Friday, November 2, 2012 5:35:39 AM
> Subject: Re: [katello-devel] Checking in Gemfile.lock files
> 
> How did you @ddavis solved the issue of different dependencies?
> 
> rpm-gems have sometimes different version dependencies than their
> counterparts on rubygems.org even if they have same version. As a
> result
> of these changes you cannot install exactly the same set of gems from
> rubygems.org (dependencies are not met because of the differences) as
> it
> would be installed on a fedora machine through rpm.
> 
> This was actually one of the reasons I created bundle-patch which is
> now
> becoming obsolete.
> 
> Petr
> 
> On 02.11.12 10:14, Petr Chalupa wrote:
> > +1 for having Gemfile.xxx.lock
> >
> > I think we should also have an automation which would be checking
> > that
> > versions of production gems on a production machine (f16, f17,
> > rhel6)
> > are same as gem versions in these 'Gemfile.xxx.lock's. Otherwise
> > the
> > versions will drift.
> >
> > On 26.10.12 14:18, David Davis wrote:
> >> I'm working on adding the Gemfile.lock for F17. I think I like the
> >> Gemfile.xxx.lock pattern too so I'll make that change.
> >>
> >> Also, I don't think this should affect the build at all since the
> >> Gemfile.lock is only being symlinked into place in development
> >> (via
> >> devsetup). I could certainly have it symlinked into place during
> >> build/install though in which case I would test it out.
> >>
> >> Thanks.
> >>
> >> David
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >>> From: "Lukas Zapletal" <lzap at redhat.com>
> >>> To: katello-devel at redhat.com
> >>> Sent: Friday, October 26, 2012 5:15:54 AM
> >>> Subject: Re: [katello-devel] Checking in Gemfile.lock files
> >>>
> >>>> I think we should add some new files to the project:
> >>>>
> >>>> src/gemfiles/Gemfilef16.lock
> >>>> src/gemfiles/Gemfilef17.lock
> >>>> src/gemfiles/Gemfilerhel6.lock
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> In the pull request I see this:
> >>>
> >>>   src/gemfiles/Gemfile.lock
> >>>   src/gemfiles/Gemfilef16.lock
> >>>   src/gemfiles/Gemfilerhel6.lock
> >>>
> >>> I like what you propose in this mail rather than having "generic"
> >>> one
> >>> in
> >>> that directory. I mean, instead Gemfile.lock I would expect
> >>> Gemfilef17.lock.
> >>>
> >>> Also I vote for different pattern - something like
> >>> Gemfile.f17.lock
> >>> which is more readable.
> >>>
> >>>> 3. People don't have to use it if they don't want to, the
> >>>> project
> >>>> won't be shipped with a lock file by default, etc.
> >>>> 4. This helps to support different systems and there is a place
> >>>> in
> >>>> the project where I can check to see what gem version a system
> >>>> is
> >>>> using.
> >>>
> >>> Please make sure you build RPM and katello is installable and
> >>> runnable.
> >>> It should not be problem, I believe we do not distribute the lock
> >>> file.
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Later,
> >>>
> >>>   Lukas "lzap" Zapletal
> >>>   #katello #systemengine
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> katello-devel mailing list
> >>> katello-devel at redhat.com
> >>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/katello-devel
> >>>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> katello-devel mailing list
> >> katello-devel at redhat.com
> >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/katello-devel
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > katello-devel mailing list
> > katello-devel at redhat.com
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/katello-devel
> 
> _______________________________________________
> katello-devel mailing list
> katello-devel at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/katello-devel
>