[katello-devel] Fedora 17 Gemfile.lock

[Mo Morsi]

Not fully sure if this addresses the issue, but you can compare your
Gemfile and Gemfile against fedora here:

http://isitfedoraruby.com/stats/gemfile_tool

I'm hoping this helps for synchronization purposes. The source code is
here incase you want to improve the tool:

https://github.com/zuhao/isitfedoraruby/blob/master/app/controllers/stats_controller.rb

It's currently a bit hacky, I am willing to give anyone that wants to
work on the codebase full commit access, no patch-review needed, and
will push any changes live immediately.

Alternatively if there is an interest we can host isitfedoraruby on
openshift or similar so that other people can push changes to the live site.

  -Mo




On 10/26/2012 09:29 AM, David Davis wrote:
> Yes, I suppose. My hope was that the Gemfile.lock for each system would match the gem rpms being used on each particular system. That way we're all using the same versions of gems per system and when a gem version is changed, it would be subject to code review (thus we could check if it was properly packaged, etc before accepting any code changes). I know that you can specify which gems ought to be used in katello.spec and Gemfile but it doesn't tell you exactly which gem versions are actually being used for each OS. This might not be the right solution for that though and if it's not, it might not be worth implementing.
>
> David
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Ivan Nečas" <inecas at redhat.com>
>> To: katello-devel at redhat.com
>> Sent: Friday, October 26, 2012 8:58:19 AM
>> Subject: Re: [katello-devel] Fedora 17 Gemfile.lock
>>
>> On 10/26/2012 02:13 PM, David Davis wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I'm adding Gemfile.lock files into version control so we can ensure
>>> we're all using the same gem versions per OS. This should also
>>> allow us to code review gem version changes in addition to gems
>>> being added. I still need a Gemfile.lock for Fedora 17. I would
>>> prefer on that is up to date (i.e. it must be pointing to
>>> rubygems.org and it must not contain ruport).
>> By saying the same gem versions per OS, you mean in case not system
>> rubygems through yum are used, such as in rvm/rbenv, right?
>>
>> -- Ivan
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> David
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> katello-devel mailing list
>>> katello-devel at redhat.com
>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/katello-devel
>>
>> --
>> Iva
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> katello-devel mailing list
>> katello-devel at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/katello-devel
>>
>