[katello-devel] Orchestration-ng thoughts
Dmitri Dolguikh
dmitri at redhat.com
Mon Apr 29 15:07:27 UTC 2013
Thanks, Ivan, for the work on the orchestration NG and the demo today.
This is a big improvement over the current implementation, and it's
actually testable!
I would like to figure out if the orchestration approach is something we
want to stick with, or should we switch to a messaging-based
(amqp?)approach? We would if not completely get rid of orchestration,
but at the very least significantly reduce the amount of it.
One of the possible approaches is where Katello is a producer of
messages (reliable, persisted, and delivery-acked), with pulp,
candlepin, and foreman acting as subscribers. The subscriber
functionality can be extracted into plugins/rails engines.
Thoughts?
-d
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/katello-devel/attachments/20130429/2ebc8c88/attachment.htm>
More information about the katello-devel
mailing list