[katello-devel] Rspec and/or mini-test?

[David Davis]

I think this is a very good question. We're using a very large amount of technologies in Katello. We have something almost 10 languages already (Ruby, Python, SASS/SCSS, Bash, Javascript, YAML, HAML, HTML, etc) and countless numbers of libraries (frameworks, gems, etc). I think this is a barrier to entry for new developers.

David

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bryan Kearney" <bkearney at redhat.com>
> To: katello-devel at redhat.com
> Sent: Saturday, March 9, 2013 8:43:06 AM
> Subject: Re: [katello-devel] Rspec and/or mini-test?
> 
> On 03/08/2013 10:54 AM, Jordan OMara wrote:
> > On 08/03/13 10:44 -0500, Brad Buckingham wrote:
> >>
> >> As for all of the existing rspec tests, my 2cents is,
> >> - if a test requires updates (e.g. as app changes), it could be
> >> removed from rspec and added to minitest
> >> - if a developer wants to 'on the side' rewrite tests in minitest,
> >> that's ok, but I wouldn't make that a focus given we have a lot of
> >> features that should get priority
> >>
> >
> > +1
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > katello-devel mailing list
> > katello-devel at redhat.com
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/katello-devel
> >
> Why are we adding a new testing framework? Is it fixing a problem in
> the
> current frameworks?
> 
> -- bk
> 
> _______________________________________________
> katello-devel mailing list
> katello-devel at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/katello-devel
>