RHEL5 Client package list question

Aaron M Morrison amm at lanl.gov
Fri Mar 30 19:29:40 UTC 2007


Howdy, has anyone noticed any features with RHEL5 + anaconda and
packages selected vs packages actually installed.

I installed a system via CD with manual package selection, and attempted
to reuse the %package section from the resulting anaconda-ks.cfg file on
a system that uses kickstart/nfs/pxeboot and I get drastically different
sets of RPMS installed.

I know that since RHEL5 is yum based, perhaps there more going on behind
the scenes...is there an option that Kickstart requires that I could be
missing?

Package line from original anaconda-ks.cfg and kickstart file for 2nd
system

%packages
@admin-tools
@base
@core
@development-libs
@development-tools
@editors
@gnome-software-development
@system-tools
@text-internet
@x-software-development
kernel-devel

Here's a diff of sorted rpm -qa > /tmp/foo output from both systems
(first 25 lines)

bash-3.00$ diff -u cd_install.rpms pxe_ks_install.rpms|head -n 25
--- cd_install.rpms     2007-03-30 13:05:28.000000000 -0600
+++ pxe_ks_install.rpms 2007-03-30 13:05:59.000000000 -0600
@@ -1,24 +1,14 @@
-a2ps-4.13b-57.1.el5
 acl-2.2.39-1.1
 acpid-1.0.4-5
-adjtimex-1.20-2.1
-agg-2.4-2.1
-aide-0.12-7
-alacarte-0.10.0-1.fc6
 alsa-lib-1.0.12-3.el5
 alsa-lib-devel-1.0.12-3.el5
 alsa-utils-1.0.12-3.fc6
-amanda-2.5.0p2-4
-amanda-client-2.5.0p2-4
 amtu-1.0.4-4
 am-utils-6.1.5-4.1.el5
 anacron-2.3-45.el5
-antlr-2.7.6-4jpp.2
 apmd-3.2.2-5
 apr-1.2.7-11
 apr-util-1.2.7-6
-arptables_jf-0.0.8-8
-arpwatch-2.1a13-15.8.1
 aspell-0.60.3-7.1


Thanks in advance
amm





More information about the Kickstart-list mailing list