[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [Libguestfs] [PATCH] Allow selinux=? and enforcing=? kernel flags to be controlled

On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 04:32:48PM +0100, Matthew Booth wrote:
> On 12/08/09 16:22, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> This is a pretty uncontroversial patch which just allows the
>> selinux=? and enforcing=? flags on the kernel command line
>> to be controlled.
>> Currently libguestfs unconditionally passes selinux=0.  By default
>> this patch does the same thing, but allows programs to enable SELinux
>> in the kernel and/or set it to enforcing mode.
> Patch looks ok except that we shouldn't include the enforcing flag. I  
> can't conceive of any reason we'd want SELinux in enforcing mode in the  
> appliance. If selinux=1, then assume enforcing=0.

Does it do any harm (now that I've written the code anyway)?


Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat  http://et.redhat.com/~rjones
virt-top is 'top' for virtual machines.  Tiny program with many
powerful monitoring features, net stats, disk stats, logging, etc.

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]