[Libosinfo] [PATCH 3/4] rhel: Specify min/recommended resources for 6.3

Christophe Fergeau cfergeau at redhat.com
Sun Dec 23 13:56:21 UTC 2012


On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 11:24:42AM -0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau at redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 06:20:56AM +0200, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
> >> From: "Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)" <zeeshanak at gnome.org>
> >>
> >> Its just a C&P from F18 and seems to work nicely in practice.
> >
> > NACK, RHEL6 is based off Fedora 12/13 (
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux#Relationship_to_free_and_community_distributions
> > ) so it makes more sense to use Fedora 13 as a reference there (at least
> > for the minimum requirements).
> > http://www.redhat.com/resourcelibrary/articles/articles-red-hat-enterprise-linux-6-technology-capabilities-and-limits
> > has some figures for the minimal RAM requirements.
> 
> Following your logic, Christophe, we should differentiate the minimal
> requirements between architectures too, right?

libosinfo already lets you differentiate requirements between arch through
the 'arch' attribute to the 'resources' node. In this case, if the
requirements are different for 32 and 64 bit installs, then yes we should
make use of this attribute.

Christophe
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/libosinfo/attachments/20121223/631eac0f/attachment.sig>


More information about the Libosinfo mailing list